The computational costs of recipient design and intention recognition in communication
Austin, TX : Cognitive Science Society
InCarlson, L.; Hölscher, C.; Shipley, T.F. (ed.), Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 465-470
33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Article in monograph or in proceedings
Display more detailsDisplay less details
SW OZ DCC AI
SW OZ DCC CO
Carlson, L.; Hölscher, C.; Shipley, T.F. (ed.), Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
SubjectCognitive artificial intelligence; DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 2: Perception, Action and Control; Software Science
Understanding the communicative intentions of others based on their behavior can be seen as an `inference to the best explanation', a.k.a. abduction. As abduction is often an intractable task, it has been suggested that communicators alleviate the work of an addressee by performing recipient design, adapting their behavior to the presumed beliefs and knowledge of the addressee. In this paper we show that communicators performing recipient design inherit the computational load of their addressees. Thus, recipient design in itself cannot explain the speed of everyday human intentional communication.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.