Fulltext present in this item

Thumbnail
Fulltext: 97907.pdf
Format: PDF
Description: publisher's version
Embargo: until further notice
Title: Extra-oral implants: insertion per- or post-ablation?
Author(s): Dings, J.P.; Maal, T.J.J. ; Muradin, M.S.; Ingels, K.J.A.O. ; Klevering, B.J. ; Koole, R.A. ; Merkx, M.A.W. ; Meijer, G.J.
Publication year: 2011
Source: Oral Oncology, vol. 47, iss. 11, (2011), pp. 1074-1078
ISSN: 1368-8375
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.07.015
Publication type: Article / Letter to editor

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : https://hdl.handle.net/2066/97907   https://hdl.handle.net/2066/97907

Display more details
Subject: NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions ONCOL 3: Translational research
NCMLS 3: Tissue engineering and pathology
NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions IGMD 3: Genomic disorders and inherited multi-system disorders
Organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Otorhinolaryngology
Ophthalmology
Dentistry
Journal title:
Oral Oncology
Volume: vol. 47
Issue: iss. 11
Page start: p. 1074
Page end: p. 1078
Abstract:
Although the benefit of extra-oral implants in the reconstruction of maxillofacial oncological defects is undisputable, some relevant issues need to be clarified. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between implants placed during ablation (DA-implants) and after ablation (AA-implants) of the tumor with respect to implant survival. In total, 103 implants were assessed: 44 nasal implants (17 patients) and 59 orbital implants (18 patients). All patients received their implant-retained maxillofacial epithesis between 1997 and 2010, with a mean follow-up of 35 months (range 8-156 months). The survival rate of DA-implants was 90.0% for the orbital region and 93.5% for the nasal region. The survival rate of the AA-implants for the orbital and the nasal region was 82.8% and 61.5%, respectively. This study shows a significant higher survival rate of extra-oral implants placed during ablative surgery compared to implants in a later stage (p=0.044), thereby stressing the importance of installing extra-oral implants during the ablative surgical session.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

Statistics