
Fulltext:
90626.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
85.84Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2010Number of pages
18 p.
Source
Cognition & Emotion, 24, 5, (2010), pp. 840-847ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ BSI KLP
SW OZ BSI SCP
Journal title
Cognition & Emotion
Volume
vol. 24
Issue
iss. 5
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 840
Page end
p. 847
Subject
Behaviour Change and Well-being; Experimental Psychopathology and TreatmentAbstract
Being subtly mimicked leads to more positive evaluations of the mimicker. Socially anxious individuals (SAs), however, should respond differently. SAs would probably either not process mimicry due to self-focused attention or not appreciate such social behaviour. Consequently, we hypothesised that they would not think more positively about a mimicking person. To test this prediction, 25 SAs and 25 non-anxious controls (NACs), all female, interacted with two virtual men (avatars) separately. One avatar mimicked the participant's head movements while giving an opinionated speech, whereas the other did not mimic. Afterwards, participants evaluated the speeches and the avatars. As predicted, NACs evaluated the mimicking avatar and his speech more positively than the non-mimicking avatar. SAs, on the other hand, evaluated both avatars and their speeches the same; comparable to how NACs evaluated the non-mimicking avatar. These results conform to the notion that mimicking does not have positive effects on SAs.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229134]
- Electronic publications [111496]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [28720]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.