
Fulltext:
90455.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
112.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
publisher's version
Publication year
2009Number of pages
13 p.
Source
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73, 3, (2009), pp. 226-238ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
FSW_Academisch centrum
SW OZ BSI KLP
Journal title
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
Volume
vol. 73
Issue
iss. 3
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 226
Page end
p. 238
Subject
Experimental Psychopathology and TreatmentAbstract
Although psychodynamic interviews often provide a broad spectrum of interesting and useful information for the therapist, most of these interviews lack sufficient psychometric quality. So far, the Developmental Profile interview seemed an exception. However, only first-level reliability ratings based on a written account of an interview had been conducted. This study presents the results of a second-level reliability study of the Developmental Profile, based on ratings of videotapes of the Profile interview. A total of 32 videotaped interviews with psychotherapeutic inpatients were rated by three independent raters in compliance with the new version of the Developmental Profile rating manual. Contrary to earlier findings, the authors found insufficient reliability. Results are discussed.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227613]
- Electronic publications [107273]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [28417]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.