A brief retrospective report on the feasibility of epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation analysis in transesophageal ultrasound- and endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle cytological aspirates.
Fulltext:
89465.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
546.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2010Source
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 5, 10, (2010), pp. 1664-7ISSN
Annotation
01 oktober 2010
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Pulmonary Diseases
Pathology
Human Genetics
Journal title
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume
vol. 5
Issue
iss. 10
Page start
p. 1664
Page end
p. 7
Subject
ONCOL 3: Translational research; ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detectionAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations is of increasing clinical importance in daily practice. In this study, we aimed to investigate the yield and applicability of molecular testing for KRAS and EGFR mutations in cytologic specimens obtained by EUS or endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA). METHODS: We selected all patients with an EUS- or EBUS-guided FNA positive for lung adenocarcinoma from the database of our tertiary care center for endosonography. Direct smears were Giemsa and Papanicolaou stained. The remaining material was processed in cell blocks. Both cell blocks and smears were considered suitable for molecular analysis when >40% of the aspirated cells were tumor cells. All eligible samples were investigated for KRAS and EGFR mutations by polymerase chain reaction followed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-two patients underwent EUS or EBUS-FNA using 22-gauge needles. In 35 patients, FNA showed lung adenocarcinoma. In eight patients, molecular analysis could not be performed because of insufficient material after routine and immunocytochemistry (n = 3), a low percentage (<40%) of tumor cells (n = 3), or an insufficient DNA quality (n = 2). The average percentage of tumor cells was 73% +/- 23%. Molecular analysis could reliably be performed in 27 patients (77%). Mutation analysis showed KRAS and EGFR mutations in tumor samples from 10 (37%) and two (7%) patients, respectively. In one patient, two EGFR mutations (p.Thr790Met and p.Leu858Arg) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular analysis for KRAS and EGFR mutations can be performed routinely in cytologic specimens from EUS- and EBUS-guided FNA.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243110]
- Electronic publications [129842]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92415]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.