Bruikbaarheid en validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-D) bij het diagnosticeren van Mild Cognitive Impairment

Fulltext:
87418.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
113.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2010Number of pages
10 p.
Source
Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie, 41, 6, (2010), pp. 231-240ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cognitive Neuroscience
Geriatrics
Medical Psychology
SW OZ DCC NRP
Journal title
Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie
Volume
vol. 41
Issue
iss. 6
Languages used
Dutch (dut)
Page start
p. 231
Page end
p. 240
Subject
DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 3: Plasticity and Memory; NCEBP 11: Alzheimer Centre; Neuropsychology and rehabilitation psychology; Neuro- en revalidatiepsychologieAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The MoCA is a new screening test to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Purpose of this study is validating the Dutch version (MoCA-D). METHOD: We administered the MoCA-D to healthy control subjects and to elderly with MCI or dementia from a memory disorder outpatient clinic and a geriatric (outpatient) clinic (n = 30, 32, 37 respectively, age > or = 60). Neuropsychological testing was part of the standard procedure for patients to diagnose MCI. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values (positive: PPV and negative: NPV) of the MoCA-D were assessed. RESULTS: A significant effect of group was found on MoCA-D total score (F (2.95) =67.9; p < 0.01). With a cutoff score of < or = 25, sensitivity and specificity to detect MCI in relation to healthy controls were 72% and 73%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 84% and 56%, respectively. With a cut-off score of < or = 20, sensitivity to detect dementia in relation to MCI was 100% for severe dementia and 75% for mild dementia. Specificity for dementia was 81%, PPV 94% and NPV 55%. CONCLUSION: The MoCA-D distinguishes between healthy elderly, MCI patients and dementia patients. However, in this study, insufficient sensitivity and poor specificity were found. For the present, applying a broader and flexible screening procedure in order to detect MCI seems a more useful method than the interpretation of one test result in particular.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [233785]
- Electronic publications [116769]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89154]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29045]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.