Abstract
The Netherlands has often been characterized as an open, tolerant country that changed into the opposite after 9/11 and the murder of van Gogh by a radical Moroccan-Dutch Muslim. It is stated that the secular freedoms of Dutch society are threatened by radical Islam. In this chapter I will explore the dominant model of managing religion in the Netherlands and problematize an unquestioned opposition between the secular and the religious by critically investigating the secularist assumptions of the Dutch state policy of domesticating Islam. A basic tenet of the Dutch model is treating Islam and Muslims as outsiders who do not belong to the Dutch moral community. Combined with recent changes in the public debates about Islam such as going from a consensual style to a confrontational style and the culturalization of citizenship the dominant political praxis of secularism leads to stimulating and integrating a so-called ‘liberal’ Islam while excluding a more assertive version of Islam that is labelled as ‘radical. As such, Dutch secularism does not advocate the complete removal of religion in the public sphere, particular strands of visible Islam are categorized as ‘radical’ and therefore to be excluded from the public domain. One of the main functions of the distinction between ‘liberal’ and ‘radical’ Islam is to create unity among the political elites who are divided over the management of religion but agree that ‘radical’ Islam does not belong to Dutch society.
