
Fulltext:
80195.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
269.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
publisher's version
Publication year
2009Source
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467, 7, (2009), pp. 1753-1764ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Orthopaedics
Health Evidence
Gynaecology
Former Organization
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & HTA
Journal title
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume
vol. 467
Issue
iss. 7
Page start
p. 1753
Page end
p. 1764
Subject
NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; NCEBP 1: Molecular epidemiology; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventionsAbstract
Although uncemented cup implants frequently are used in young patients, we believe long-term survival rates of cups in these patients are somewhat disappointing, and therefore we have continued to use cemented cups in primary THA, even in young patients. However, in cases of acetabular bone stock defects, we also use bone impaction grafting. We prospectively followed 130 patients with 175 cemented cups; no patients were lost to followup. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 31 years (range, 16-39 years). An acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting was performed in 84 hips (48%). The minimum followup was 2 years (average, 8.1 years; range, 2.0-18.5 years). Twenty-one of the 175 cups (12%) were revised at an average of 8.1 years (range, 2.0-18.5 years). Reasons for revision were infection (one early, seven late), recurrent dislocations (two), traumatic loosening (one), and aseptic loosening (10). The 10-year survival rate of all cemented cups with end point of revision for any cause was 85%. Survival with end point of aseptic loosening of all cups was 92%. Survival with end point of revision for aseptic loosening was 90% for the cups without impaction grafting and 95% for the cups with impaction grafting. We believe cemented acetabular cups in young patients have acceptable midterm survival; however, in the case of acetabular bone defects, we recommend reconstruction with impaction grafting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [204994]
- Electronic publications [103240]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [81051]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.