Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation.
Fulltext:
79970.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
269.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2009Source
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 13, (2009), pp. 1862-70ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cardiology
IQ Healthcare
Former Organization
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Volume
vol. 18
Issue
iss. 13
Page start
p. 1862
Page end
p. 70
Subject
NCEBP 14: Cardiovascular diseases; NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health care; ONCOL 4: Quality of CareAbstract
AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate if ambulation four hours after sheath removal can replace ambulation 10 hours or more after sheath removal with regard to puncture site complications after percutaneous coronary interventions and to examine patient comfort in both groups. BACKGROUND: Early ambulation after percutaneous coronary intervention may facilitate earlier hospital discharge. Whether this approach is safe, is unknown. DESIGN: A non-randomised comparative study. METHODS: Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by femoral approach. Registered nurses of the ward removed the sheath and haemostasis was achieved by manual compression. After bed rest with a compression bandage for four hours, the patients in the early ambulation group were ambulated. The patients in the control group stayed in bed till the next morning. Primary study endpoint was the composition of puncture site complications: haematoma, bleeding, false aneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Secondary endpoints were occurrence of vasovagal collapse after mobilisation, back pain and problems with voiding. RESULTS: In the early ambulation group (n = 329) the total number of complications was nine (2.7%), vs. six (3.0%) in the control group (n = 202). The complication rate in the early ambulation group is not increased compared to the control group (test for non-inferiority p = 0.002). Hence non-inferiority is accepted and practical equivalence shown. There were no statistically significant differences concerning patient comfort between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation four hours after femoral sheath removal is feasible and safe. The incidence of puncture site complications in the early ambulation group is not increased in comparison with the group with prolonged bed rest. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Patients could possibly be discharged earlier after percutaneous coronary intervention, allowing percutaneous coronary intervention in an ambulant setting. Further research should confirm these findings and extend the research to the effect of various closure devices in early ambulation and on patients' well-being.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [248099]
- Electronic publications [135524]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [94006]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.