A review on the use of molecular markers of cytotoxic therapy for colorectal cancer, what have we learned?

Fulltext:
79745.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.087Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2009Source
European Journal of Cancer, 45, 11, (2009), pp. 1935-49ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Oncology
Pathology
Journal title
European Journal of Cancer
Volume
vol. 45
Issue
iss. 11
Page start
p. 1935
Page end
p. 49
Subject
NCMLS 2: Immune Regulation; NCMLS 6: Genetics and epigenetic pathways of disease; ONCOL 1: Hereditary cancer and cancer-related syndromes; ONCOL 2: Age-related aspects of cancer; ONCOL 3: Translational research; ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detectionAbstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, significant progress has been achieved in the cytotoxic treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) by the use of fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. However, as not all patients do respond to chemotherapy, there is a need for predictive and prognostic factors in order to optimise the treatment for individual patients. Although many potential molecular markers have been studied, none of these have been implemented in the standard of care for colorectal cancer patients. METHOD: We performed a review of the data on the prognostic and/or predictive value of molecular markers for cytotoxic drugs in CRC. The following markers were included: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, orotate phosphoribosyl transferase, thymidine phosphorylase, thymidylate synthase, mismatch repair deficiency, topoisomerase 1, excision cross-complementing gene and carboxylesterases. RESULTS: With the exception of mismatch repair deficiency, these molecular markers showed divergent and inconsistent results on their prognostic and/or predictive value. This underscores the complexity of the role of these markers. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that further retrospective testing of these markers is unlikely to add clinically useful results. More definite results may only be expected when these markers are included in the design of prospective randomised studies.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234204]
- Electronic publications [117151]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89179]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.