Fulltext:
77334.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
126.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Journal of Southern African Studies, 35, 4, (2009), pp. 915-927ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ RSCR CAOS
Journal title
Journal of Southern African Studies
Volume
vol. 35
Issue
iss. 4
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 915
Page end
p. 927
Subject
Anthropology and Development StudiesAbstract
This article examines assumptions about the provision of support for children and young people in child-headed households in sub-Saharan Africa. The South African example is used to assess appropriate family- and community-based support and assistance. The South African Children's Act proposes that child-headed households should be supported by an adult mentor, who will act in the children and young people's best interests. However, qualitative research among child-headed households in Port Elizabeth shows that so-called 'adult support' mostly does not contribute to children and young people's well-being. Children and young people often are not consulted about care arrangements, are not taken seriously, or are even worse off after adult interventions, resulting in many having a sense of powerlessness over their situation. An emphasis on access to social grants increases the potential for abuse of these youngsters. The study reveals the value of taking generational constructions into account in assessing current practice and developing more appropriate support arrangements.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [238430]
- Electronic publications [122512]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29483]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.