The usefulness of the Staff-Patient Interaction Response Scale for palliative care nursing for measuring the empathetic capacity of nursing students.
Fulltext:
70633.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
145.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2008Source
Journal of Professional Nursing, 24, 5, (2008), pp. 315-23ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
IQ Healthcare
Health Evidence
Former Organization
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title
Journal of Professional Nursing
Volume
vol. 24
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. 315
Page end
p. 23
Subject
EBP 2: Effective Hospital Care; EBP 4: Quality of Care; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; NCEBP 6:Quality of nursing and allied health care; NCEBP 9: Mental health; ONCOL 4: Quality of CareAbstract
In communicating with patients, especially patients receiving palliative care, empathy plays an important role. Little research has as yet been conducted into the development of the empathetic capacity of nursing students at various educational levels. An instrument that may be suitable for such research is the Staff-Patient Interaction Response Scale for Palliative Care Nursing (SPIRS-PCN). The purpose of the article is to determine the validity and reliability of the SPIRS-PCN, an instrument measuring empathy in palliative care. The criterion-related validity, homogeneity, and interrater reliability of the SPIRS-PCN were determined in nursing students (n = 357) who varied in gender, age, religious orientation, educational level, and experience in patient care. The validity of the SPIRS-PCN was underlined by identification of differences for religious orientation and the amount of experience. The variables gender, age, and educational level were not significant in relation to SPIRS-PCN scores. The homogeneity (Cronbach's alpha = .80) and interrater reliability (.74) of the instrument were adequate. We conclude that validity of the SPIRS-PCN was partially supported, whereas reliability was demonstrated. The instrument is feasible in educational situations; we recommend further research into the instrument's validity, especially in the progression of students' scores during the study program.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243859]
- Electronic publications [130610]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92795]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.