Fulltext present in this item

Thumbnail
Fulltext: 70383.pdf
Format: PDF
Description: publisher's version
Title: Ethical Expertise Revisted: Reply to Giles Scofield
Author(s): Steinkamp, N.L. ; Gordijn, B. ; Have, H.A.M.J. ten
Publication year: 2008
Source: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, vol. 18, iss. 4, (2008), pp. 385-392
ISSN: 1054-6863
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0263
Publication type: Article / Letter to editor

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : http://hdl.handle.net/2066/70383   http://hdl.handle.net/2066/70383

Display more details
Subject: EBP 4: Quality of Care
NCEBP 5: Health care ethics
Organization: IQ Healthcare
Former Organization: Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title:
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Volume: vol. 18
Issue: iss. 4
Page start: p. 385
Page end: p. 392
Abstract:
In a recent article, Steinkamp, Gordijn, and ten Have discussed a new way of thinking about the ethics consultant's ethical expertise. After critiquing their model of ethical expertise, along with the notion that discourse can and will enable ethicists to consult without over-reaching, this essay suggests that the debate about ethical expertise is intractable because it constitutes a 'tragic choice'.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

Statistics