Heterogeneity in conduit artery function in humans: impact of arterial size.
Fulltext:
70039thijssen.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
547.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2008Source
American Journal of Physiology : Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 295, 5, (2008), pp. H1927-34ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Physiology
Journal title
American Journal of Physiology : Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Volume
vol. 295
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. H1927
Page end
p. 34
Subject
IGMD 5: Health aging / healthy living; NCEBP 14: Cardiovascular diseases; UMCN 2.2: Vascular medicine and diabetes; UMCN 5.5: Nutrition and HealthAbstract
To determine whether conduit artery size affects functional responses, we compared the magnitude, time course, and eliciting shear rate stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy men (n = 20; 31 +/- 7 yr). Upper limb (brachial and radial) and lower limb (common and superficial femoral) FMD responses were simultaneously assessed, whereas popliteal responses were measured in the same subjects during a separate visit. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-mediated responses were similarly examined. Edge detection and wall tracking of high-resolution B-mode arterial ultrasound images, combined with synchronized Doppler waveform envelope analysis, were used to calculate conduit artery diameter, blood flow, and shear rate continuously across the cardiac cycle. Baseline artery size correlated inversely with the FMD response (r = -0.57, P < 0.001). Within-artery comparisons revealed a significant inverse correlation between artery size and FMD% for the radial (r = -0.66, P = 0.001), brachial (r = -0.55, P = 0.01), and popliteal artery (r = -0.48, P = 0.03), but not for the superficial and common femoral artery. Normalization of FMD responses for differences in eliciting shear rate did not abolish the between-artery relationship for artery function and size (r = -0.48, P < 0.001), suggesting that differences between artery function responses were not entirely due to size-related differences in shear rate. This was reinforced by a significant between-artery correlation for GTN responses and baseline artery size (r = -0.74, P < 0.001). In summary, systematic differences exist in vascular function responses of conduit arteries that differ in size. This raises the possibility that differences in artery size within or between individuals may influence functional responses.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [248380]
- Electronic publications [135728]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [94201]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.