Fulltext:
69844.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
129.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2008Source
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65, 1, (2008), pp. 39-46ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Internal Medicine
IQ Healthcare
Medical Technology Assessment
Health Evidence
Medical Psychology
Former Organization
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume
vol. 65
Issue
iss. 1
Page start
p. 39
Page end
p. 46
Subject
EBP 2: Effective Hospital Care; EBP 3: Effective Primary Care and Public Health; EBP 4: Quality of Care; NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; NCEBP 3: Implementation Science; NCEBP 8: Psychological determinants of chronic illness; NCEBP 9: Mental health; ONCOL 1: Hereditary cancer and cancer-related syndromes; ONCOL 4: Quality of Care; ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detectionAbstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is associated with a high use of health care services. To reduce the related costs for patients and society, it will be useful to know which factors determine CFS patients' amount of health care use. Little is known, however, about these factors. METHOD: The present study retrospectively performed a cross-sectional analysis to investigate the possible factors determining CFS patients' health care use. A total of 263 CFS patients, derived from two subgroups (149 from tertiary care and 114 from primary/secondary care), participated. Health care use was measured with a questionnaire asking details on consumption over the past 6 months. Fatigue severity and physical functioning were measured with the subscale Experienced Fatigue of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20) and the subscale Physical Functioning of the SF-36, respectively. Multiple regression analysis, T-tests, and chi(2) tests were performed. RESULTS: The regression analysis revealed that, after controlling for patient characteristics (explaining 13%), fatigue factors added 4% predictive value and certain perpetuating factors of fatigue, including focus on bodily symptoms and attributions of fatigue, added another 5%. The analysis of subgroups revealed that, compared to the tertiary care population, fewer patients from primary/secondary care had visited a medical specialist (50% vs. 71%), used antidepressants (16% vs. 25%) and tranquilizers (3% vs. 18%), and had spent a night in hospital (7% vs. 10%). However, overall costs of health care between these subgroups did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that illness duration, physical impairment due to fatigue, and psychological perpetuating factors of fatigue do determine the variance in CFS patients' health care use. These results give clear directions for treating CFS patients and managing health care for CFS.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246764]
- Electronic publications [134215]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93461]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.