Debating ethical expertise.
SourceKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18, 2, (2008), pp. 173-192
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
SubjectEBP 4: Quality of Care; NCEBP 5: Health care ethics
This paper explores the relevance of the debate about ethical expertise for the practice of clinical ethics. We present definitions, explain three theories of ethical expertise, and identify arguments that have been brought up to either support the concept of ethical expertise or call it into question. Finally, we discuss four theses: the debate is relevant for the practice of clinical ethics in that it (1) improves and specifies clinical ethicists' perception of their expertise; (2) contributes to improving the perception of moral competence of non-ethicists; (3) gives insight into complementary styles of argumentation of ethicists and non-ethicists; and (4) contributes to the awareness of the problem of profession-building of (clinical) ethicists.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.