Low priority main reason not to participate in a colorectal cancer screening program with a faecal occult blood test.
until further notice
SourceJournal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 30, 4, (2008), pp. 461-465
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England)
SubjectIGMD 2: Molecular gastro-enterology and hepatology; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; UMCN 1.2: Molecular diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring
BACKGROUND: Compared with screening programs for breast and cervical cancer, reported participation rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are low. The effectiveness of a screening program is strongly influenced by the participation rate. The aim of this study was to investigate the main reasons not to participate in a population-based, invitational CRC screening program. METHODS: In the Dutch study program for CRC screening, a random selection of 20 623 persons were invited received a faecal occult blood test. Of the non-participants, 500 were randomly selected and contacted for a standardized telephone interview from November 2006 to May 2007 to document the main reason not to participate. RESULTS: In total, 312 (62%) non-participants could be included for analysis. Most frequently, reported reasons for non-participation were time-related or priority-related (36%), including 'did not notice test in mailbox' (13%) and 'forgot' (8%). Other reasons were health-related issues, such as 'severe illness' (9%), or emotional reasons, such as 'family circumstances' (7%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the reported reasons not to participate reflect low priority for screening. Adding extra instructions and information, and addressing specific concerns through additional interventions should be considered to improve individual decision-making about participation in future CRC population-based screening programs.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.