
Fulltext:
63285.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
52.20Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2003Source
Medical Hypotheses, 60, 1, (2003), pp. 116-118ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ DCC SMN
Former Organization
SW OZ NICI BI
Journal title
Medical Hypotheses
Volume
vol. 60
Issue
iss. 1
Page start
p. 116
Page end
p. 118
Subject
Cognitive neuroscienceAbstract
The phenomenological evidence for distinguishing between REM and NREM sleep is overwhelming. However, this difference has only been found thanks to electrophysiological analytical methods, and is practically non existent in phenotypic terms, i.e., observable with the naked eye. It is well accepted that the selective pressure determining evolutionary changes can only work upon phenotypic differences. Hence, it follows that the differences between REM and NREM could not have been selected through evolution and this implies that, in functional terms, both states could be equivalent.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234109]
- Electronic publications [116863]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29125]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.