The dialogue between data and model: passive stability and relaxation behavior in a ball bouncing task
until further notice
SourceNonlinear Studies, 11, 3, (2004), pp. 319-344
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
We investigate the skill of rhythmically bouncing a ball on a racket with a focus on the mathematical modeling of the stability of performance. As a first step we derive the deterministic ball bouncing map as a Poincar´e section of a sinusoidally driven bouncing ball. Subsequently, we show the ball bouncing map to have a passively stable regime. More precisely, for negative racket acceleration at impact, no control of racket amplitude or frequency is necessary for stable performance. Support for the model comes from a motor learning study, where a decrease in variability covaries with a change of mean acceleration at impact towards more negative values. For a more fine-grained test of the model we develop a stochastic version of it, by adding Gaussian white noise to the dynamics. We then test the model predictions for the correlation functions. We find that the observed correlation functions match the theoretical ones quite well, lending new support for the model. Lastly, we compare the observed recovery from a sudden change with which the ball leaves the racket with model predictions. We find a mismatch between data and model in the sense that the model is too “slow”. We take this failure of the ball bouncing model as an impetus to further develop the model. In the perturbation study, we observe a significant modulation of the racket period but not of the racket amplitude. Thus, racket period seems a candidate state variable that should be included the ball bouncing map.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Non RU Publications 
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.