Patient preferences for expectant management vs. surgical evacuation in first-trimester uncomplicated miscarriage.
Publication year
2004Source
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 2, (2004), pp. 167-73ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Health Evidence
Former Organization
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & HTA
Journal title
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume
vol. 57
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 167
Page end
p. 73
Subject
EBP 2: Effective Hospital Care; UMCN 1.5: Interventional oncologyAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Expectant and surgical management are widely accepted treatment options in case of a miscarriage. In the absence of differences in complications, the choice between both options can be based on patient preferences. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied treatment preferences for future miscarriages in women with a miscarriage randomized to expectant or surgical treatment or managed according to their own choice. RESULTS: Data from 136 patients were analyzed. Women randomized either to expectant or surgical management opted for the allocated treatment in future in 55 and 74%, respectively. Of the women randomized to expectant management and with a successful spontaneous loss, 71% opted again for this treatment. Women who were managed according to their own treatment choice, held on to their initial treatment preference (expectant vs. surgical management; 84 and 88%, respectively). Preferences after treatment were strong. CONCLUSION: A strong treatment preference should be taken into account in the counseling process. Women without a preference should be well informed on all medical aspects of the two options in order to facilitate informed-shared decision-making.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [242527]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92283]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.