Fulltext:
55820.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
154.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2008Source
Cognition & Emotion, 22, 2, (2008), pp. 353-373ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ BSI OGG
Journal title
Cognition & Emotion
Volume
vol. 22
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 353
Page end
p. 373
Subject
Developmental PsychopathologyAbstract
This study compared the effects of four ways of inducing anger: film, stress interview, punishment, and harassment. Sixty-four healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of these conditions. Effects were examined by means of self-report and physiological measures (blood pressure, heart rate, skin conductance level, and skin conductance response). All four methods produced comparable levels of self-reported anger, while harassment and interview produced the largest cardiovascular effects, and electrodermal activity increased more in reaction to harassment, interview, and punishment conditions compared to film. Thus, physiological reactivity was especially increased by anger-induction methods that included personal contact (harassment and interview). Regarding specificity of self-reported emotions, fear and frustration were the only emotions out of nine non-target emotions that increased in comparable degree to anger following film, interview, and punishment, while harassment produced more self-reported anger than fear. Possible explanations and further recommendations are discussed.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246764]
- Electronic publications [134215]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30508]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.