Parental compliance after screening social development in toddlers.
until further notice
SourceArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 4, (2007), pp. 363-8
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
PI Group Memory & Emotion
F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Subject110 012 Social cognition of verbal communication; 150 000 MR Techniques in Brain Function; DCN 1: Perception and Action; DCN 3: Neuroinformatics; EBP 1: Determinants in Health and Disease; NCEBP 9: Mental health
OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of parents' compliance with follow-up measurements after their child tested positive at a screening to assess problems in social development, as well as to find demographic, screening-related, and child-specific factors associated with parental compliance. DESIGN: Two-stage screening design. SETTING: Utrecht, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A random population of 31,724 children were screened at well-baby clinics at age 14 to 15 months (screen 1). Three hundred sixty-four children underwent screen 2 (255 children who scored positive at screen 1 [population screening] and 109 children younger than 36 months who were identified by surveillance because of suspected problems in their social development). Main Exposure A 2-stage screening was applied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with recommendations of having either a second screening (after screen 1) or clinical evaluation (after screen 2). RESULTS: Of 370 children who tested positive at screen 1, parents of 255 children (69%) complied with screen 2. Three groups were distinguished after screen 2 (n = 173): early compliance (clinical evaluation within 6 months) (68%), late compliance (clinical evaluation after 6 months) (14%), and noncompliance (no clinical evaluation) (18%). Late compliance and noncompliance were more common in parents of younger children and children who were identified via population screening. Parents of children with either relatively high cognitive skills and/or low scores on screening measures were less inclined to comply. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest higher effectiveness of surveillance over population screening. Screening may well be applied as a second step after surveillance to identify children who need further clinical evaluation.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.