Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy.
Fulltext:
51590.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
563.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2007Source
Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 3, (2007), pp. 296-302ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
IQ Healthcare
Former Organization
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title
Patient Education and Counseling
Volume
vol. 66
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 296
Page end
p. 302
Subject
EBP 4: Quality of Care; NCEBP 3: Implementation ScienceAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide psychometric characteristics of the Italian language version of the OPTION scale and descriptive statistics on patients' involvement. The OPTION scale assesses the extent to which clinicians involve patients in therapeutic decisions. The English language version has a Cohen's kappa score for individual items ranging from 0.45 to 0.98 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score of 0.77. METHODS: Six male GPs provided 235 audiotaped consultations with consecutive patients who had attended for a new illness episode over a 2-month period. Thirty interviews were rated by two raters to assess inter- and intra rater as well as test-retest reliability of the Italian language version of the OPTION scale. Based on the whole sample, Cronbach's alpha and an exploratory factor analysis were performed to assess internal validity and to determine factor loadings. RESULTS: Cohen's kappa values were comprised between 0.29 and 0.73, the ICC at test and retest was 0.85 and 0.81 and Cronbach's alpha 0.82. The ratings for each OPTION item showed a skewed distribution: the majority of scores (>70%) were between 0 (behaviour absent) and 2 (minimum skill level). CONCLUSION: The reliability indices were satisfactory and similar to those reported for the original OPTION. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: OPTION can be used for both teaching purposes and research, as well as for future cross-national comparisons.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [242559]
- Electronic publications [129542]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92285]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.