Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder respond similarly to age-matched controls in both speed and accuracy if goal-directed movements are made across the midline.

Fulltext:
51312.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
136.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2006Source
Child: Care, Health and Development, 32, 6, (2006), pp. 703-10ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Rehabilitation
Journal title
Child: Care, Health and Development
Volume
vol. 32
Issue
iss. 6
Page start
p. 703
Page end
p. 10
Subject
DCN 1: Perception and Action; UMCN 3.2 Cognitive NeurosciencesAbstract
BACKGROUND: The conventional view among many clinicians is that crossing the midline in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) results in degradation of their performance. However, no kinematic data yet exist to support this view. We therefore tested this assumption in an experimental setting. METHODS: A group of age- and gender-matched children with DCD (n = 48) and a group of typically developing children (n = 48) were compared while performing goal-directed movements with a pen on a XY-tablet. We examined whether speed or accuracy changed if the goal-directed movements were made towards targets positioned either at the midline, the contralateral (crossed) side or the ipsilateral (uncrossed) side of the body midline. RESULTS: Our results showed that movements in the contralateral workspace were less accurate for both groups of children in the tested age range (6-11 years). The movements made towards the targets in the midline were the fastest, and the pen pressure for movements in the ipsilateral space was the highest. However, these effects were similar for children with and without DCD. As expected, children with DCD made more errors, were slower and pressed more erratically on their pen, but this difference was irrespective of the position of their hand in the workspace. CONCLUSION: Crossing the midline in children with DCD for small amplitude movements (2.5 cm), as tested in this study, does not result in increased degradation of the goal-directed movements compared with their typically developing peers. This implies that, contrary to expectation, there is no evidence for a preferential deficit in DCD in brain structures involved in making movements in the contralateral workspace.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229196]
- Electronic publications [111643]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [87796]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.