The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.

Fulltext:
50203.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.254Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2006Source
American Journal of Surgery, 192, 2, (2006), pp. 172-8ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Surgery
Radiology
Pathology
Journal title
American Journal of Surgery
Volume
vol. 192
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 172
Page end
p. 8
Subject
CTR 1: Functional imaging; ONCOL 1: Hereditary cancer and cancer-related syndromes; UMCN 1.1: Functional ImagingAbstract
BACKGROUND: The value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and size assessment of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and DCIS with small (<10 mm) invasive carcinoma was evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with DCIS and 12 patients with DCIS and small invasive carcinoma were included. Mammographic (N = 64) and MRI (N = 22) images were retrospectively reviewed. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess differences in size between imaging and histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Mammographic rate of detection for DCIS was 48/52 (92%) and for DCIS with small invasive carcinoma, 10/12 (83%). MRI revealed 1 false negative case and the rate of detection for DCIS was 16/17 (94%). Correlation of mammographic size with histopathologic size was r = .44 (P < .01) and r = 0.49 (P = .03) for MRI. Mammography underestimated lesion size by 5 mm or more in 47%, whereas with MRI size was adequately assessed in 43% and overestimated in 38%. CONCLUSIONS: DCIS can be visualised on MRI with high sensitivity, although tumor size can be overestimated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227245]
- Electronic publications [108531]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86731]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.