A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.
Fulltext:
49588.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
235.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2006Source
European Spine Journal, 15, 5, (2006), pp. 527-36ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
IQ Healthcare
Neurosurgery
Neurology
Dermatology
Former Organization
Centre for Quality of Care Research
Journal title
European Spine Journal
Volume
vol. 15
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. 527
Page end
p. 36
Subject
DCN 1: Perception and Action; DCN 2: Functional Neurogenomics; EBP 1: Determinants of Health and Disease; EBP 4: Quality of Care; N4i 4: Auto-immunity, transplantation and immunotherapy; NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; NCEBP 6:Quality of nursing and allied health care; NCEBP 8: Psychological determinants of chronic illness; UMCN 3.2 Cognitive Neurosciences; UMCN 3.2: Cognitive neurosciencesAbstract
The objective of this systematic review is to summarize scientific evidence concerning the predictive value of bio-psychosocial risk factors with regard to the outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Medical and psychological databases were used to locate potentially relevant articles, which resulted in the selection of 11 studies. Each of these studies has a prospective design that examined the predictive value of preoperative variables for the outcome of lumbar disc surgery. Results indicated that socio-demographic, clinical, work-related as well as psychological factors predict lumbar disc surgery outcome. Findings showed relatively consistently that a lower level of education, a higher level of preoperative pain, less work satisfaction, a longer duration of sick leave, higher levels of psychological complaints and more passive avoidance coping function as predictors of an unfavourable outcome in terms of pain, disability, work capacity, or a combination of these outcome measures. The results of this review provide preliminary opportunities to select patients at risk for an unfavourable outcome. However, further systematic and methodologically high quality research is required, particularly for those predictors that can be positively influenced by multidisciplinary interventions.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246625]
- Electronic publications [134196]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93367]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.