Improved tumour detection by gastrin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastasised medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Fulltext:
49478.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
231.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2006Source
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 33, 11, (2006), pp. 1273-9ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Nuclear Medicine
Journal title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume
vol. 33
Issue
iss. 11
Page start
p. 1273
Page end
p. 9
Subject
IGMD 1: Functional imaging; N4i 1: Pathogenesis and modulation of inflammation; ONCOL 3: Translational research; ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detection; UMCN 1.1: Functional ImagingAbstract
PURPOSE: Radiopeptide imaging is a valuable imaging method in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET). To determine the clinical performance of gastrin receptor scintigraphy (GRS), it was compared with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), computed tomography (CT) and (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with metastasised/recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients underwent imaging with GRS, SRS (19 patients), CT and PET (26 patients). GRS and SRS were compared with respect to tumour detection and uptake. CT, PET, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) and follow-up were used for verification of findings. In addition, GRS, CT and PET were directly compared with each other to determine which method performs best. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent both GRS and SRS. Among these, GRS showed a tumour detection rate of 94.2% as compared to 40.7% for SRS [mean number of tumour sites (+/-SD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI): GRS 4.3+/-3.1/2.8-5.7, SRS 1.8+/-1.6/1.1-2.6]. In 26 patients, GRS, CT and PET were compared. Here, GRS showed a tumour detection rate of 87.3% (CT 76.1%, PET 67.2%; mean number of tumour sites and 95% CI: GRS 4.5+/-4.0/2.9-6.1, CT 3.9+/-3.5/2.5-5.3, PET 3.5+/-3.3/2.1-4.8). If GRS and CT were combined, they were able to detect 96.7% of areas of tumour involvement. CONCLUSION: GRS had a higher tumour detection rate than SRS and PET in our study. GRS in combination with CT was most effective in the detection of metastatic MTC.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227245]
- Electronic publications [108531]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86731]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.