
Fulltext:
46332.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
76.31Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Culture and Organization, 11, 2, (2005), pp. 29-44ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Personeelsmanagement - t/m 2007
Former Organization
Personeelsmanagement
Journal title
Culture and Organization
Volume
vol. 11
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 29
Page end
p. 44
Subject
PARTicipation and New Employment RelationsAbstract
Organization has a very complex relationship with contamination in the sense that they both need and fear it. We define this ambivalent or paradoxical characteristic of organization as hosophobic and argue that some forms of contamination are deemed to be dangerous whereas other forms, most notably the contamination of people, are considered as more than welcome. Using some philosophical sources (Deleuze, Sloterdijk, pataphysics, neognosis), we explore the organizational ambivalence towards contamination and ask whether other, new, unexpected forms of contamination are imaginable in organizations. We claim that the hosophobic nature of organizations should be understood within the broader context of a cultural ambivalence in our society towards dirt, hygiene, infection, and immunity.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229074]
- Electronic publications [111477]
- Nijmegen School of Management [17956]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.