
Fulltext:
39241.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
216.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2005Source
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 2, (2005), pp. 179-91ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Leerstoel Praktische filosofie
Former Organization
Religie- en cultuurtheorie
Journal title
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume
vol. 8
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 179
Page end
p. 91
Subject
Centre for Ethics; EBP 4: Quality of Care; Practical Philosophy; Transformation of Religion in the Frameworks of Modernity; Praktische filosofie; Transformation of Religion within the Frameworks of ModernityAbstract
This paper explores the ambiguous notion of bodily integrity, focusing on male and female circumcision. In the empirical part of the study we describe and analyse the various meanings that are given to the notion of bodily integrity by people in their daily lives. In the philosophical part we distinguish (1) between a person-oriented and a body-oriented approach and (2) between four levels of interpretation, i.e. bodily integrity conceived of as a biological wholeness, an experiential wholeness, an intact wholeness, and as an inviolable wholeness. We argue that bodily integrity is a prima facie principle in its own right, closely connected with, but still fundamentally different from, the principle of personal autonomy, that is, autonomy over the body.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234109]
- Electronic publications [116785]
- Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies [11118]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.