Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision.
until further notice
SourceMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 2, (2005), pp. 179-91
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Leerstoel Praktische filosofie
Religie- en cultuurtheorie
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
SubjectCentre for Ethics; EBP 4: Quality of Care; Practical Philosophy; Transformation of Religion in the Frameworks of Modernity; Praktische filosofie; Transformation of Religion within the Frameworks of Modernity
This paper explores the ambiguous notion of bodily integrity, focusing on male and female circumcision. In the empirical part of the study we describe and analyse the various meanings that are given to the notion of bodily integrity by people in their daily lives. In the philosophical part we distinguish (1) between a person-oriented and a body-oriented approach and (2) between four levels of interpretation, i.e. bodily integrity conceived of as a biological wholeness, an experiential wholeness, an intact wholeness, and as an inviolable wholeness. We argue that bodily integrity is a prima facie principle in its own right, closely connected with, but still fundamentally different from, the principle of personal autonomy, that is, autonomy over the body.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications 
- Electronic publications 
- Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies 
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.