Concurrent validity of objective assessment by finger tracking for open surgical suturing training.
Publication year
2024Source
American Journal of Surgery, 237, (2024), pp. 115805, article 115805ISSN
Annotation
01 november 2024
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Surgery
Journal title
American Journal of Surgery
Volume
vol. 237
Page start
p. 115805
Subject
Surgery - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the parameters 'time' and 'distance', measured by SurgTrac, correlate with the assessment of the same skills by blinded experts. METHODS: Basic open suturing tasks were executed by medical students. SurgTrac software measured objective parameters by tracking fingers. The executed tasks were recorded by a tablet and additionally assessed by a blinded expert with a Competency Assessment Tool-form (CAT-form). A Pearson's correlation was used to investigate the correlation between the parameters and the outcomes of the expert assessment. RESULTS: A strong correlation between the measured parameters of SurgTrac and the expert-assessment was found for knot tying by hand (r = -0.703) and vertical mattress suture (r = -0.644) and a moderate correlation for transcutaneous suture (r = -0.555) and intracutaneous suture (r = -0.451). CONCLUSION: The use of finger tracking by SurgTrac showed a good concurrent validity for the basic open suturing tasks knot tying by hand, transcutaneous suture and vertical mattress suture.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243908]
- Electronic publications [130674]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92803]
- Open Access publications [104963]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.