rTMS as a next step in antidepressant nonresponders: A randomized comparison with current antidepressant treatment approaches
Fulltext:
309311.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.437Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2024Author(s)
Number of pages
9 p.
Source
American Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 9, (2024), pp. 806-814ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Psychiatry
SW OZ BSI KLP
Primary and Community Care
PI Group Cognitive Affective Neuroscience
Journal title
American Journal of Psychiatry
Volume
vol. 181
Issue
iss. 9
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 806
Page end
p. 814
Subject
Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment; Cognitive Affective Neuroscience; Primary and Community Care - Radboud University Medical Center - DCMN; Psychiatry - Radboud University Medical Center - DCMNAbstract
Objective: Although repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for depression, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of rTMS and other treatment options, such as antidepressants. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, rTMS was compared with the next pharmacological treatment step in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Methods: Patients with unipolar nonpsychotic depression (N=89) with an inadequate response to at least two treatment trials were randomized to treatment with rTMS or to a switch of antidepressants, both in combination with psychotherapy. Treatment duration was 8 weeks and consisted of either 25 high-frequency rTMS sessions to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or a switch of antidepressant medication following the Dutch treatment algorithm. The primary outcome was change in depression severity based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Secondary outcomes were response and remission rates as well as change in symptom dimensions (anhedonia, anxiety, sleep, rumination, and cognitive reactivity). Finally, expectations regarding treatment were assessed. Results: rTMS resulted in a significantly larger reduction in depressive symptoms than medication, which was also reflected in higher response (37.5% vs. 14.6%) and remission (27.1% vs. 4.9%) rates. A larger decrease in symptoms of anxiety and anhedonia was observed after rTMS compared with a switch in antidepressants, and no difference from the medication group was seen for symptom reductions in rumination, cognitive reactivity, and sleep disorders. Expectations regarding treatment correlated with changes in HAM-D scores. Conclusions: In a sample of patients with moderately treatment-resistant depression, rTMS was more effective in reducing depressive symptoms than a switch of antidepressant medication. In addition, the findings suggest that the choice of treatment may be guided by specific symptom dimensions.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246515]
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging [4040]
- Electronic publications [134102]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93308]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30494]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.