Comparing the evidence for botulinum neurotoxin injections in paediatric anterior drooling: A scoping review
Publication year
2024Author(s)
Number of pages
11 p.
Source
European Journal of Pediatrics, 183, 1, (2024), pp. 83-93ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Paediatrics
Rehabilitation
SW OZ BSI OLO
Otorhinolaryngology
Journal title
European Journal of Pediatrics
Volume
vol. 183
Issue
iss. 1
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 83
Page end
p. 93
Subject
Learning and Plasticity; Otorhinolaryngology - Radboud University Medical Center; Paediatrics - Radboud University Medical Center - DCMN; Rehabilitation - Radboud University Medical Center; Rehabilitation - Radboud University Medical Center - DCMNAbstract
Paediatric anterior drooling has a major impact on the daily lives of children and caregivers. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections are considered an effective treatment to diminish drooling. However, there is no international consensus on which major salivary glands should be injected to obtain optimal treatment effect while minimizing the risk of side effects. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence for submandibular BoNT-A injections and concurrent submandibular and parotid (i.e. four-gland) injections, respectively, and assess whether outcomes could be compared across studies to improve decision making regarding the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment approach for paediatric anterior drooling. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies (until October 1, 2023) on submandibular or four-gland BoNT-A injections for the treatment of anterior drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Similarities and differences in treatment, patient, outcome, and follow-up characteristics were assessed. Twenty-eight papers were identified; 7 reporting on submandibular injections and 21 on four-gland injections. No major differences in treatment procedures or timing of follow-up were found. However, patient characteristics were poorly reported, there was great variety in outcome measurement, and the assessment of side effects was not clearly described.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [242839]
- Electronic publications [129660]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92293]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29971]
- Open Access publications [104240]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.