PET Imaging and Protein Expression of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Inventory Study.
Fulltext:
297371.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.064Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2023Author(s)
Source
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (1978), 64, 10, (2023), pp. 1526-1531ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Imaging
Neurosurgery
Biochemistry (UMC)
Journal title
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (1978)
Volume
vol. 64
Issue
iss. 10
Page start
p. 1526
Page end
p. 1531
Subject
Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Neurosurgery; Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract Medical Imaging; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science Medical Imaging; Radboudumc 19: Nanomedicine Biochemistry (UMC); Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in neovasculature has been described in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), whereas vasculature in nonaffected brain shows hardly any expression of PSMA. It is unclear whether PSMA-targeting tracer uptake on PET is based on PSMA-specific binding to neovasculature or aspecific uptake in tumor. Here, we quantified uptake of various PSMA-targeting tracers in GBM and correlated this with PSMA expression in tumor biopsy samples from the same patients. Methods: Fourteen patients diagnosed with de novo (n = 8) or recurrent (n = 6) GBM underwent a preoperative PET scan after injection of 1.5 MBq/kg [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 7), 200 MBq of [(18)F]DCFpyl (n = 3), or 200 MBq of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 (n = 4). Uptake in tumor and tumor-to-background ratios, with contralateral nonaffected brain as background, were determined. In a subset of patients, PSMA expression levels from different regions in the tumor tissue samples (n = 40), determined using immunohistochemistry (n = 35) or RNA sequencing (n = 13), were correlated with tracer uptake on PET. Results: Moderate to high (SUV(max), 1.3-20.0) heterogeneous uptake was found in all tumors irrespective of the tracer type used. Uptake in nonaffected brain was low, resulting in high tumor-to-background ratios (6.1-359.0) calculated by dividing SUV(max) of tumor by SUV(max) of background. Immunohistochemistry showed variable PSMA expression on endothelial cells of tumor microvasculature, as well as on dispersed individual cells (of unknown origin), and granular staining of the neuropil. No correlation was found between in vivo uptake and PSMA expression levels (for immunohistochemistry, r = -0.173, P = 0.320; for RNA, r = -0.033, P = 0.915). Conclusion: Our results indicate the potential use of various PSMA-targeting tracers in GBM. However, we found no correlation between PSMA expression levels on immunohistochemistry and uptake intensity on PET. Whether this may be explained by methodologic reasons, such as the inability to measure functionally active PSMA with immunohistochemistry, tracer pharmacokinetics, or the contribution of a disturbed blood-brain barrier to tracer retention, should still be investigated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246764]
- Electronic publications [134218]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93461]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.