Sex differences in adverse drug reactions from Adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases
Fulltext:
297012.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.997Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2023Source
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 22, 6, (2023), pp. 501-507ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Clinical Pharmacy
Radboudumc Extern
Gastroenterology
Journal title
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Volume
vol. 22
Issue
iss. 6
Page start
p. 501
Page end
p. 507
Subject
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science Clinical Pharmacy; Radboudumc 5: Inflammatory diseases Gastroenterology; Clinical Pharmacy - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND: We examine sex differences in relation to the nature, frequency, and burden of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis patients using etanercept or adalimumab from the Dutch Biologic Monitor were sent bimonthly questionnaires concerning experienced ADRs. Sex differences in the proportion and nature of reported ADRs were assessed. Additionally, 5-point Likert-type scales reported for the burden of ADRs, were compared between sexes. RESULTS: In total 748 consecutive patients were included (59% female). From the women 55% reported ≥1 ADR, which was significantly higher than 38% of the men that reported ≥1 ADR (p < 0.001). A total of 882 ADRs were reported comprising 264 distinct ADRs. The nature of the reported ADRs differed significantly between both sexes (p = 0.02). Women in particular reported more injection site reactions than men. The burden of ADRs was similar between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in the frequency and nature of ADRs, but not in ADR burden, exist during treatment with adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This should be taken into consideration when investigating and reporting results on ADRs and when counseling patients in daily clinical practice.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246425]
- Electronic publications [134061]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93307]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.