Low and Highly Variable Exposure to Prophylactic LMWH Nadroparin in Critically Ill Patients: Back to the Drawing Board for Prophylactic Dosing?
Fulltext:
291342.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
860.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2023Source
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 62, 2, (2023), pp. 297-305ISSN
Annotation
01 februari 2023
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Clinical Pharmacy
Journal title
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Volume
vol. 62
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 297
Page end
p. 305
Subject
Radboudumc 4: lnfectious Diseases and Global Health Clinical Pharmacy; Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-molecular-weight heparins are routinely administered to patients in the intensive care unit to prevent venous thromboembolisms. There is considerable evidence that low-molecular-weight heparin doses should be personalised based on anti-Xa levels, but pharmacokinetic data in intensive care unit patients are lacking. This study aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetics and associated variability of the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin in critically ill patients. METHODS: Critically ill adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and received nadroparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism were included in a study. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by means of parametric non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM). RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled with 12 patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodialysis and 18 patients not undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodialysis. Very high variability in pharmacokinetics was observed with an inter-individual variability in the volume of distribution of 63.7% (95% confidence interval 46.5-90.6), clearance of 166% (95% confidence interval 84.7-280) and relative bioavailability of 40.2% (95% confidence interval 29.5-52.6). We found that standard doses of 2850 IE and 5700 IE of nadroparin resulted in sub-prophylactic exposure in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low exposure and highly variable pharmacokinetics of nadroparin were observed in intensive care unit patients treated with a prophylactic dose. It can be debated whether nadroparin is currently dosed optimally in intensive care unit patients and our findings encourage the investigation of higher and tailored dosing of nadroparin in the critically ill.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [244262]
- Electronic publications [131202]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92892]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.