Barriers and facilitators for implementation of the SWORD evidence-based psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence in three different healthcare settings
Publication year
2023Author(s)
Number of pages
15 p.
Source
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 17, 4, (2023), pp. 1057-1071ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Psychology
Psychiatry
SW OZ BSI KLP
Haematology
IQ Healthcare
Primary and Community Care
Journal title
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume
vol. 17
Issue
iss. 4
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 1057
Page end
p. 1071
Subject
Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment; Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers Haematology; Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers IQ Healthcare; Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers Medical Psychology; Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers Primary and Community Care; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science IQ Healthcare; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science Psychiatry; Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
Purpose: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions are effective, but few are implemented. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the evidence-based blended SWORD intervention in routine psycho-oncological care. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 19 cancer survivors and 18 professionals from three healthcare settings assessed barriers and facilitators in six domains as described by the determinant frameworks of Grol and Flottorp: (1) innovation, (2) professionals, (3) patients, (4) social context, (5) organization, and (6) economic and political context. Results: In the innovation domain, there were few barriers. Facilitators included high reliability, accessibility, and relevance of SWORD. In the professional domain, physicians and nurses barriers were lack of self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills to address FCR whereas psychologists had sufficient knowledge and skills, but some were critical towards protocolized treatments, cognitive behavioral therapy, or eHealth. Patient domain barriers included lack of FCR awareness, negative expectations of psychotherapy, and unwillingness/inability to actively engage in treatment. A social context domain barrier was poor communication between different healthcare professionals. Organization domain barriers included inadequate referral structures to psychological services, limited capacity, and complex legal procedures. Economic and political context domain barriers included lack of a national implementation structure for evidence-based psycho-oncological interventions and eHealth platform costs. Conclusions: Implementation strategies should be targeted at patient, professional, organizational and economic and political domains. Identified barriers and facilitators are relevant to other researchers in psycho-oncology that aim to bridge the research-practice gap.
Implications for cancer survivors: This study contributes to the implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions for cancer survivors, who can benefit from these services.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246216]
- Electronic publications [133894]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93266]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30432]
- Open Access publications [107414]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.