Abstract
Three experiments examined spontaneous recovery from extinction of appetitive conditioned responding (CR) as a function of training history. Rats first received reinforced and non-reinforced conditioning trials. Groups of rats were equated for total number of reinforced trials but differed in the number of non-reinforced trials, or in the order of reinforced and non-reinforced trials. CR was then extinguished in all groups. Subsequently, the extent of recovery of CR was assessed in a test session performed either 1 or 17 days after the last extinction session. After a 17-day delay, rats that had received all reinforced trials immediately prior to the first extinction session showed stronger recovery than did rats having received all reinforced trials at the beginning of training, or interspersed among non-reinforced trials. No significant spontaneous recovery was observed after a 1-day test delay. These results, which may be of clinical relevance with respect to relapse after therapy, are explained in terms of the training schedules generating differences in strength of inhibitory associations, and a relatively long, but not a short, test delay attenuating these associations.
