The association of potential prognostic determinants to nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy: An exploratory prospective prognostic study
Fulltext:
251397.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
253.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2022Source
Surgery, 172, 1, (2022), pp. 349-357ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
IQ Healthcare
Journal title
Surgery
Volume
vol. 172
Issue
iss. 1
Page start
p. 349
Page end
p. 357
Subject
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; IQ Healthcare - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND: Up to now it is unclear which determinants influence nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of prognostic determinants to nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study on patients with wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Data of 25 potential prognostic determinants of nonadherence were collected using a web-based case record form. Primary outcome was nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy, defined as premature termination on request of the patient. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between the potential determinants and nonadherence. RESULTS: Nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy was found in 32 out of 264 patients (12.1%). Univariable analyses identified 6 candidate prognostic determinants: having sensitive skin (odds ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval 1.10-5.10, P = .03), decision for negative pressure wound therapy made as a shared decision (odds ratio 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.06-6.30, P = .05), handiness technique (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 0.86-3.89, P = .13), alternatives discussed (odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 0.83-3.75, P = .13), knowledge and understanding negative pressure wound therapy (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.18-1.20, P = .15), and previous experience with negative pressure wound therapy (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.10-1.24, P = .17). In the multivariable analysis, only having sensitive skin appeared to be significant (odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.02-4.85, P = .05). CONCLUSION: Patients who have sensitive skin may have an increased risk of premature termination of negative pressure wound therapy. Further research is warranted to determine which strategies are successful to overcome skin irritation problems to avoid nonadherence to negative pressure wound therapy.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243110]
- Electronic publications [129700]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92415]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.