Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
Publication year
2022Author(s)
Number of pages
14 p.
Source
Neurotherapeutics, 19, 4, (2022), pp. 1259-1272ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Neurology
Health Evidence
IQ Healthcare
SW OZ DCC CO
PI Group Intention & Action
Journal title
Neurotherapeutics
Volume
vol. 19
Issue
iss. 4
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 1259
Page end
p. 1272
Subject
111 000 Intention & Action; Action, intention, and motor control; All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 3: Disorders of movement DCMN: Donders Center for Medical NeuroscienceAbstract
Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate if a two-week regimen of daily cerebellar tDCS sessions diminishes ataxia and non-motor symptom severity and alters cerebellar-M1 connectivity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients received ten sessions of real or sham cerebellar tDCS (i.e., five days per week for two consecutive weeks). Effects were evaluated after two weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months. Change in Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score after two weeks was defined as the primary endpoint. Static posturography, SCA Functional Index tests, various patient-reported outcome measures, the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale, and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) served as secondary endpoints. Absolute change in SARA score did not differ between both trial arms at any of the time points. We observed significant short-term improvements in several motor, cognitive, and patient-reported outcomes after the last stimulation session in both groups but no treatment effects in favor of real tDCS. Nonetheless, some of the patients in the intervention arm showed a sustained reduction in SARA score lasting six or even twelve months, indicating interindividual variability in treatment response. CBI, which reflects the functional integrity of the cerebellothalamocortical tract, remained unchanged after ten tDCS sessions. Albeit exploratory, there was some indication for between-group differences in SARA speech score after six and twelve months and in the number of extracerebellar signs after three and six months. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that a two-week treatment with daily cerebellar tDCS sessions reduces ataxia severity or restores cerebellar-M1 connectivity in early-to-middle-stage SCA3 patients at the group level. In order to potentially increase therapeutic efficacy, further research is warranted to identify individual predictors of symptomatic improvement.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [232014]
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging [3760]
- Electronic publications [115251]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89012]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29077]
- Open Access publications [82628]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.