A 5 to 7-year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation
Publication year
2021Source
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23, 3, (2021), pp. 400-407ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Dentistry
Journal title
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume
vol. 23
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 400
Page end
p. 407
Subject
Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
BACKGROUND: Bony concavities at the buccal aspect may cause a distortion between the implant axis and ideal prosthetic axis. Angulated implants can overcome this problem, yet long-term data are lacking. In addition, papilla-sparing incisions have been proposed to reduce tissue loss, yet aesthetic outcomes have not been published. PURPOSE: To evaluate the 5 to 7-year outcome of single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had been consecutively treated with a single angulated implant (Co-axis®, Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) in the anterior maxilla were re-examined after 5 to 7 years. Available data at 1 year (T1) were compared to those obtained at 5 to 7 years (T2). RESULTS: Twenty out of 22 treated patients (11 females, 9 males, mean age of 52) with 22 implants attended the 5 to 7-year reassessment. All implants survived and stable clinical conditions could be reached with mean marginal bone loss of 1.28 mm at T2. Papilla-sparing flap elevation resulted in Pink Esthetic Score of 9.83 at T1 and 8.23 at T2 (p = 0.072). Mucosal Scarring Index was 4.61 at T1 and 3.50 at T2 (p = 0.165). The overall appearance of scarring significantly improved over time (p = 0.032), yet 59% of the cases still demonstrated scarring at T2.c CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, angulated implants (Co-axis®, Southern Implants) reached stable clinical conditions. Papilla-sparing incisions may not be recommended in aesthetically demanding patients due to high risk of scarring.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229222]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [87796]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.