Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis
Publication year
2021Source
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 35, 10, (2021), pp. 5422-5429ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Gastroenterology
Journal title
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume
vol. 35
Issue
iss. 10
Page start
p. 5422
Page end
p. 5429
Subject
Radboudumc 0: Other Research RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Radboudumc 11: Renal disorders RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for large lateral spreading and sessile polyps. The reported high recurrence rate of approximately 20% is however one of the major drawbacks. Several endoscopic interventions have been suggested to reduce recurrence rates. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of endoscopic interventions targeting the EMR margin to reduce recurrence rates. METHODS: We searched in PubMed and Ovid for studies comparing recurrence rates after interventions targeting the EMR margin with standard EMR. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate at the first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) assessed histologically or macroscopically. For the meta-analysis, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and pooled using a random effects model. The secondary outcome was post-procedural complication rates. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 1335 lesions were included in the meta-analysis. The techniques performed in the intervention group targeting the resection margin were argon plasma coagulation, snare tip soft coagulation, extended EMR, and precutting EMR. The interventions reduced the adenoma recurrence rate with more than 50%, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.18, 0.76) comparing the intervention group with the control groups. Overall post-procedural complication rates did not increase significantly in the intervention arm (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.65, 2.58). CONCLUSION: Interventions targeting the EMR margin decrease recurrence rates and may not result in more complications.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227207]
- Electronic publications [108520]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86711]
- Open Access publications [77768]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.