Anorectal dose-effect relations for late gastrointestinal toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial
Publication year
2021Source
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 162, (2021), pp. 98-104ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Radiation Oncology
Journal title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Volume
vol. 162
Page start
p. 98
Page end
p. 104
Subject
Radboudumc 15: Urological cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radiation Oncology - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The phase III FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed an increase in five-year biochemical disease-free survival, with no significant increase in toxicity when adding a focal boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer [Kerkmeijer et al. JCO 2021]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between delivered radiation dose to the anorectum and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (grade >/=2). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients in the FLAME trial were analyzed, irrespective of treatment arm. The dose-effect relation of the anorectal dose parameters (D2cm(3) and D50%) and GI toxicity grade >/=2 in four years of follow-up was assessed using a mixed model analysis for repeated measurements, adjusted for age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline toxicity grade >/=1, hormonal therapy and institute. RESULTS: A dose-effect relation for D2cm(3) and D50% was observed with adjusted odds ratios of 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21, p < 0.0001) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.14-1.25, p < 0.0001) for GI toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there was no difference in toxicity between study arms, a higher radiation dose to the anorectum was associated with a statistically significant increase in GI toxicity following EBRT for prostate cancer. This dose-effect relation was present for both large and small anorectal volumes. Therefore, further increase in dose to the anorectum should be weighed against the benefit of focal dose escalation for prostate cancer.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246936]
- Electronic publications [134293]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93487]
- Open Access publications [107816]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.