In
Bouvier, G.; Rosenbaum, J.E. (ed.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation, pp. 53-78Publication type
Part of book or chapter of book

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Editor(s)
Bouvier, G.
Rosenbaum, J.E.
Organization
SW OZ BSI CW
Languages used
English (eng)
Book title
Bouvier, G.; Rosenbaum, J.E. (ed.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation
Page start
p. 53
Page end
p. 78
Subject
Communication and MediaAbstract
This chapter investigates how political candidates utilize Twitter to communicate with each other to better understand the role Twitter plays in facilitating public debate. Taking a communication network approach, Vergeer uses the 2012 Dutch national election to provide insight into how political candidates interact on Twitter and describe the structure of the candidates' online communication network. Results regarding candidate interaction on Twitter are mixed: most candidates only tweet occasionally, and while reciprocity was observed it often only occurred between party members, especially incumbents. While Twitter thus provides political candidates with the opportunity to conduct interparty discussions, it appears that few do and that Twitter is mainly used as a broadcasting platform. As such, candidates do not use the full democratic potential of the platform.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [202863]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [27115]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.