The Impact of the Extent of Surgery on the Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Meta-Analysis
Publication year
2020Source
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9, 7, (2020), article 2316ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Health Evidence
Surgery
Haematology
IQ Healthcare
Internal Medicine
Medical Oncology
Journal title
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume
vol. 9
Issue
iss. 7
Subject
Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Health Evidence - Radboud University Medical Center; IQ Healthcare - Radboud University Medical Center; Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center; Medical Oncology - Radboud University Medical Center; Surgery - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
Recently, the management of patients with low-risk differentiated non-medullary thyroid cancer (DTC), including papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma subtypes, has been critically appraised, questioning whether these patients might be overtreated without a clear clinical benefit. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline suggests that thyroid lobectomy (TL) could be a safe alternative for total thyroidectomy (TT) in patients with DTC up to 4 cm limited to the thyroid, without metastases. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcomes in patients with low-risk DTC based on the extent of surgery. The risk ratio (RR) of recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were estimated. In total 16 studies with 175,430 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, low recurrence rates were observed for both TL and TT groups (7 vs. 7%, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.61-1.96, I(2) = 72%), and no statistically significant differences for OS (TL 94.1 vs. TT 94.4%, RR 0.99, CI 0.99-1.00, I(2) = 53%), DFS (TL 87 vs. TT 91%, RR 0.96, CI 0.89-1.03, I(2) = 85%), and DSS (TL 97.2 vs. TT 95.4%, RR 1.01, CI 1.00-1.01, I(2) = 74%). The high degree of heterogeneity of the studies is a notable limitation. Conservative management and appropriate follow-up instead of bilateral surgery would be justifiable in selected patients. These findings highlight the importance of shared-decision making in the management of patients with small, low-risk DTC.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243984]
- Electronic publications [130695]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92811]
- Open Access publications [104970]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.