Parallels in reactionary argumentation in US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol
until further notice
SourceClimatic Change, 86, 1-2, (2008), pp. 67-82
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Leerstoel Wijsgerige ethiek en politieke filosofie
SubjectCenter for Political Philosophy and Ethics (CPPE)
Today, the United States is as dependent on fossil fuels for its patterns of consumption and production as its South was on slavery in the mid-nineteenth century. That US congressmen tend to rationalise fossil fuel use despite climate risks to future generations just as Southern congressmen rationalised slavery despite ideals of equality is perhaps unsurprising, then. This article explores similarities between the rationalisation of slavery in the abolition debates and the rationalisation of ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases in the US congressional debates on the Kyoto Protocol.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Non RU Publications 
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.