
Fulltext:
224642.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
538.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2017Source
Forest Policy and Economics, 80, (2017), pp. 141-149ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Leerstoel Wijsgerige ethiek en politieke filosofie
Journal title
Forest Policy and Economics
Volume
vol. 80
Page start
p. 141
Page end
p. 149
Abstract
Two payments for forest ecosystem services (PFES) schemes under one common legal-institutional coordination mechanism but different historical-institutional background and organizational design are analyzed to measure and explain their transaction costs (TC). Data on TC related to payment transfers and conditionality compliance are collected using a combination of in-depth interviews with local PFES scheme coordinators, site visits, and secondary data analysis. The two PFES schemes show substantial differences in TC despite the fact that they emerged from the same legal-institutional framework due to differences in participation rates, types of forest ecosystem services providers, and payment characteristics.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Non RU Publications [14980]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.