Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care.
Publication year
2003Source
Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12, 2, (2003), pp. 107-111ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Preventative Restorative Dentistry
IQ Healthcare
Journal title
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Volume
vol. 12
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 107
Page end
p. 111
Subject
EBP 3: Effective Primary Care and Public Health; EBP 4: Quality of CareAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the opinions of general dental practitioners regarding the development and importance of clinical practice guidelines and their contribution to the quality of dental care. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1656 dentists in the Netherlands. Factor analysis was conducted to identify scales of variables, and a reliability analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the identified scales. The effect of the independent variables is expressed as odds ratio per scale part (standard deviation, SD). Regression analyses were conducted to study determinants of the opinions on clinical guidelines. RESULTS: The response rate was 73%; 54% of the respondents supported the development of clinical practice guidelines for dentists. Most respondents indicated that clinical practice guidelines could be used as a checklist, as a support in daily clinical decision making, and as a basis for continuing dental education. The factor analyses yielded four scale factors-contribution of guidelines to effectiveness of care (OR 1.95/SD), contribution of guidelines to professional autonomy (OR 1.70/SD), contribution of guidelines to quality of care (OR 2.52/SD), and contribution of guidelines to collaboration (OR 1.49/SD)-which complied with the criterion of Cronbach's alpha >0.60. Multiple regression analysis with the four scale factors as dependent variables yielded only extremely low correlations for practice and dentist characteristics (R(2)=0.01-0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Only about 50% of dentists support the development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Guidelines are seen as helpful in the provision of continuing dental education and as a support in daily clinical decision making. The most important barrier to successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines is the fear of dental practitioners that guidelines will reduce their professional autonomy. Practice and dentist characteristics are unrelated to dentists' opinions on clinical practice guidelines.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [203812]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [80326]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.