Fulltext:
220711.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
5.889Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Cognition, 202, (2020), article 104311ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ DCC PL
Journal title
Cognition
Volume
vol. 202
Languages used
English (eng)
Subject
PsycholinguisticsAbstract
In English and Dutch, listeners entrain to prosodic contours to predict where focus will fall in an utterance. Here, we ask whether this strategy is universally available, even in languages with very different phonological systems (e.g., tone versus non-tone languages). In a phoneme detection experiment, we examined whether prosodic entrainment also occurs in Mandarin Chinese, a tone language, where the use of various suprasegmental cues to lexical identity may take precedence over their use in salience. Consistent with the results from Germanic languages, response times were facilitated when preceding intonation predicted high stress on the target-bearing word, and the lexical tone of the target word (i.e., rising versus falling) did not affect the Mandarin listeners' response. Further, the extent to which prosodic entrainment was used to detect the target phoneme was the same in both English and Mandarin listeners. Nevertheless, native Mandarin speakers did not adopt an entrainment strategy when the sentences were presented in English, consistent with the suggestion that L2 listening may be strained by additional functional load from prosodic processing. These findings have implications for how universal and language-specific mechanisms interact in the perception of focus structure in everyday discourse.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [248471]
- Electronic publications [135728]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30737]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.