
Fulltext:
214099.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
219.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2019Source
Family Practice, 36, 5, (2019), pp. 587-593ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Oncology
Anesthesiology
Primary and Community Care
Geriatrics
IQ Healthcare
Journal title
Family Practice
Volume
vol. 36
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. 587
Page end
p. 593
Subject
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 1: Alzheimer`s disease DCMN: Donders Center for Medical NeuroscienceAbstract
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a crucial element of palliative care. It improves the quality of end-of-life care and reduces aggressive and needless life-prolonging medical interventions. However, little is known about its application in daily practice. This study aims to examine the application of ACP for patients with cancer in general practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 11 general practices in the Netherlands. Electronic patient records (EPRs) of deceased patients with colorectal or lung cancer were analysed. Data on ACP documentation, correspondence between medical specialist and GP, and health care use in the last year of life were extracted. RESULTS: Records of 163 deceased patients were analysed. In 74% of the records, one or more ACP items were registered. GPs especially documented patients' preferences for euthanasia (58%), palliative sedation (46%) and preferred place of death (26%). Per patient, GPs received on average six letters from medical specialists. These letters mainly contained information regarding medical treatment and rarely ACP items. In the last year of life, patients contacted the GP over 30 times, and 51% visited the emergency department at least once, of whom 54% in the last month. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of ACP items in GPs' EPRs appeared to be limited. ACP elements were rarely subject of communication between primary and secondary care, which may impact the continuity of patient care during the last year of life. More emphasis on registration of ACP items and better exchange of information regarding patients' preferences are needed.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229016]
- Electronic publications [111213]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [87728]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.