Publication year
2001Source
European Sociological Review, 17, 3, (2001), pp. 275-294ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ RSCR SOC
Journal title
European Sociological Review
Volume
vol. 17
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 275
Page end
p. 294
Subject
Inequality, cohesion and modernization; Ongelijkheid, cohesie en moderniseringAbstract
Level of education has always been the focus of attention in studies on the intergenerational transmission of education. Consequently, we do not know whether field of study is a relevant new boundary. We expect field of study to be important, because it indicates the type of resources that students acquire. We tested hypotheses about parental effects on the field on study of respondents to the Dutch Family Surveys of 1992 and 1998 (N=2949). In the Dutch educational system the choice of a specific educational programme is made at various educational levels. The association between the educational fields of father and child appeared to be particularly strong in general, teacher/educational, and agricultural fields, and was hardly affected by other family characteristics. Interestingly, children from lower-class backgrounds were over-represented in fields of study with favourable labour-market opportunities, and children from the economic and cultural élite selected fields where they could reproduce their family capital.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246515]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30494]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.